CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Constitution of Qatar

fundamental law of Qatar

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ18207796
Source-derived summary

The Constitution of Qatar (Arabic: دستور قطر Dastūr Qatar) is the supreme law of the State of Qatar. It came into effect on 9 April 2004. The constitution was overwhelmingly approved, with almost 97% in favour.

Parts of the Constitution

Unlike many constitutions, the Constitution of Qatar has no preamble.

Some of the most important articles in the constitution are listed below:

Part One

Article 1 – Islam is official religion of the state, and sharia a principal source of legislation. Its political system is democratic. Arabic is the official language.

Article 2 – Doha is the capital of the state. It can be transferred to any other place by law. The state cannot cede any of its territory.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Constitution of Qatar” as fundamental law of Qatar. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Constitution, Qatar and fundamental can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as fundamental law of Qatar. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18207796. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Constitution of Qatar”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Constitution of Qatar primary sources, Constitution of Qatar archive and Constitution research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Constitution of Qatar”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Constitution of Qatar” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.