CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Constituency NA-210

former constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 19, 2025
Entity authorityQ13211684
Source-derived summary

Constituency NA-210 (Kashmore) (Urdu: این اے-۲۱۰، کشمور) was a constituency for the National Assembly of Pakistan. It was abolished in the 2018 delimitations after merging it with NA-209 and creating the new constituency of NA-197. This step was mainly done in view of Kashmore's elevation to district level in 2004 and the results of the 2017 census.

Election 2002

General elections were held on 10 October 2002. Sardar Saleem Jan Khan Mazari of National Alliance won by 82,810 votes.

Election 2008

General elections were held on 18 February 2008. Nasrullah Khan Bijarani of PML-Q won by 82,189 votes.

By-Election 2008

Election 2013

General elections were held on 11 May 2013. Ehsan ur Rehman Mazari of PPP won by 55,808 votes and became the member of National Assembly.

Editorial summary

“Constituency NA-210” enters the record as former constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Constituency, NA-210 and former can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2018, 2004, 2017, 2002—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Constituency, NA-210 and former.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Constituency NA-210” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Constituency, NA-210 and former provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 19, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q13211684. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018, 2004, 2017 and 2002.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Constituency NA-210”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Constituency NA-210 primary sources, Constituency NA-210 archive and Constituency research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Constituency NA-210”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Constituency NA-210” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.