CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

APX

complexity class of approximable problems

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ4653447
Source-derived summary

In computational complexity theory, the class APX (an abbreviation of "approximable") is the set of NP optimization problems that allow polynomial-time approximation algorithms with approximation ratio bounded by a constant (or constant-factor approximation algorithms for short). In simple terms, problems in this class have efficient algorithms that can find an answer within some fixed multiplicative factor of the optimal answer.

Definition

An approximation algorithm is called an

f

(

n

)

{\displaystyle f(n)}

-approximation algorithm for input size

n

{\displaystyle n}

if it can be proven that the solution that the algorithm finds is at most a multiplicative factor of

f

(

n

)

{\displaystyle f(n)}

times worse than the optimal solution. Here,

f

(

n

)

{\displaystyle f(n)}

is called the approximation ratio. Problems in APX are those with algorithms for which the approximation ratio

f

(

n

)

{\displaystyle f(n)}

is a constant

c

{\displaystyle c}

. The approximation ratio is conventionally stated greater than 1. In the case of minimization problems,

f

(

n

)

{\displaystyle f(n)}

is the found solution's score divided by the optimum solution's score, while for maximization problems the reverse is the case. For maximization problems, where an inferior solution has a smaller score,

f

(

n

)

{\displaystyle f(n)}

is sometimes stated as less than 1; in such cases, the reciprocal of

f

(

n

)

{\displaystyle f(n)}

is the ratio of the score of the found solution to the score of the optimum solution.

A problem is said to have a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) if for every multiplicative factor of the optimum worse than 1 there is a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the problem to within that factor. Unless P = NP there exist problems that are in APX but without a PTAS, so the class of problems with a PTAS is strictly contained in APX. One example of a problem with a PTAS is the knapsack problem.

Editorial summary

“APX” enters the record as complexity class of approximable problems. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what complexity, class and approximable can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 318-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around complexity, class and approximable.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“APX” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, complexity, class and approximable provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4653447. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “APX”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow APX primary sources, APX archive and complexity research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “APX”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from APX” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.