Apocheima
genus of insects

Apocheima is a genus of moths in the family Geometridae erected by Jacob Hübner in 1825, also known as Phigalia.
Species
Apocheima cinerarium (Erschoff, 1874)
Apocheima denticulata (Hulst, 1900)
Apocheima djakonovi (Moltrecht, 1933)
Apocheima hispidaria (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) – small brindled beauty
Apocheima owadai Nakajima, 1994
Apocheima pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) – pale brindled beauty
Apocheima plumogeraria (Hulst, 1888)
Apocheima strigataria (Minot, 1869)
Apocheima titea (Cramer, 1780)
Apocheima verecundaria Leech, 1897
References
Savela, Markku. "Apocheima Hübner, [1825]". Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms. Retrieved December 27, 2017.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Apocheima” is genus of insects. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Apocheima, genus and insects, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “genus of insects” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4780123. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1825, 1874, 1900 and 1933.
Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Apocheima”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Apocheima primary sources, Apocheima archive and Apocheima research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Apocheima”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Apocheima” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.