CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Coniochaeta

genus of fungi

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ10457878 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Coniochaeta are a genus of pleomorphic yeasts of the order Coniochaetales and are pathogens of trees. Some species have also been found to form endophytic associations within plants in which they live inside plant tissues but do not actually harm the organism. They can take the form of pink to brown colonies, hyphae, conidiophores or sclerotia. In 2013, the Lecythophora were merged with the Coniochaeta, following suggestions by Ziauddin Khan et al.

Ecology

The Coniochaeta have been described as typically associated with wood, water, and soil. However, there is also growing evidence of specialised associations between each species and specific environments, and a suggestion that 4-spored and 8-spored species interact differently with their environments, some species surviving forest fires, which activate their sexual cycle.

Medical Issues

Other members of the Coniochaeta, most commonly Coniochaeta polymorpha, can cause clinical infections in immunocompromised individuals, which has increased recent interest in the genus.

Species

As accepted by Species Fungorum;

Former species;

C. brassicae (P. Crouan & H. Crouan) Cooke (1887) = Cladorrhinum olerum, Podosporaceae family

C. calva (Tode) Popuschoj (1971) = Lasiosphaeria calva, Lasiosphaeriaceae

C. canina (Deanna A. Sutton, Gené & Cano) Deanna A. Sutton, Gené & Cano (2013) = Lecythophora canina, Coniochaetaceae

C. capillifera (Curr.) Cooke (1888) = Hypocopra capillifera, Xylariaceae

C. elaeidicola (Henn.) C. Moreau & M. Moreau (1949) = Stilbohypoxylon elaeidicola, Xylariaceae

C. ershadii Zare, Asgari & W. Gams (2007) = Coniolariella ershadii, Xylariaceae

C. hypoxylina (Ces.) Lar.N. Vassiljeva (1998) = Stilbohypoxylon hypoxylinum, Xylariaceae

C. gamsii Asgari & Zare (2006) = Coniolariella limonispora, Xylariaceae

C. nodulisporioides D. Hawksw. (1978) = Coniocessia nodulisporioides, Coniocessiaceae

C. obliquata (Sommerf.) Minter (2007) = Rosellinia obliquata, Xylariaceae

C. pilosella (P. Karst.) Cooke (1887) = Capronia pilosella, Herpotrichiellaceae

C. polyspora (W. Phillips & Plowr.) N. Lundq. (1992) = Sordaria polyspora, Sordariaceae

C. queenslandiae Henn.

Editorial summary

“Coniochaeta” enters the record as genus of fungi. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Coniochaeta, genus and fungi can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013, 1887, 1971, 1888—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Coniochaeta, genus and fungi.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Coniochaeta” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Coniochaeta, genus and fungi provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10457878. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013, 1887, 1971 and 1888.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Coniochaeta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Coniochaeta primary sources, Coniochaeta archive and Coniochaeta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Coniochaeta”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Coniochaeta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.