CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Synathroesmus

rhetorical device involving listing

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ140690652
Source-derived summary

Synathroesmus (sin-ath-RES-mus) is a rhetorical device which involves the collection or listing of words, often adjectives, in a list; it also may be spelled synathroismos or sinathrismus and is also referred to as frequentatio or the heaping figure. The gathered words may or may not be synonyms and may involve the collection of previous phrases or ideas from an oral or written work. Often, synathroesmus is used invectively: to emphasize blame or negative traits.

Etymology

Synathroesmus is derived from Greek synathroismos (Greek: συναθροισμός; "a collection, union")

Rhetorical use

Synathroesmus, being a collection of like terms, is meant to emphasize a description of the subject. When the subject is an inanimate object, synathroesmus may enliven it and create vivid imagery. The piling up of descriptions can accentuate a cumulative favoring or disfavoring towards its subject; in the latter case, where is it a heap of insults, it is referred to as bdelygmia

According to Mark Forsyth, part of the effectiveness of such listings is because of their unnaturalness in normal oral language which emphasizes imagery or tone in a manner unfound in human speech: "Nobody but a God or a fool talks in lists."

Examples

In "Nicholas Nickleby," Dickens uses synathroesmus by describing a character as "a proud, haughty, consequential, turned-up-nose peacock." The device is used to exacerbate the snobbyness of the character.

Shakespeare, in The Tempest, uses synathroesmus in the following lines: "The cloud-capp'd towers, the gorgeous palaces, / The solemn temples, the great glope itself"

The following quote (with liberty taken to modernize archaic spelling) is an example given by Richard Sherry: "He is an harlot of his own body, he lies in wait for others, greedy, intemperate, wanton, proud, unnatural to his parents, unkind to his friends, troublesome to his kinsfolk, stubborn to his betters, disdainful to his equals, cruel to his inferiors, finally, intolerable to all men." Note the device, similar to the above example, being used to degrade its subject; Sherry describes his use of synathroesmus more akin to accumulatio.

In The Path to Rome, Belloc declares, "So this threat about the heavy task of beginning breeds discouragement, anger, vexation, irritability, bad style, pomposity and infinitives split from helm to saddle, and metaphors mixed as the Carlton."

Belloc, again in The Path to Rome, jokes, "I see. You would not pile words one on the other, qualifying, exaggerating, conditioning, superlative, diminishing, connecting, amplifying, condensing, mouthing, and glorifying the mere sound: you would be terse."

Subcategories

Synathroesmus is a broad rhetorical category that describes types of listings; those subcategories include the following:

Synonymia

Synonymia is synathroesmus in which the listed terms are synonymous with each other with the purpose of emphasizing emotional meaning or increasing clarity.

For example, in Julius Caesar, a Roman tribune named Marullus insults the Caesar-supporting Romans by exclaiming, "You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!" This bdelygmia is an example of synonymia because it involves repeated synonyms and aims to intensify the pejorative name-calling.

Editorial summary

“Synathroesmus” enters the record as rhetorical device involving listing. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Synathroesmus, rhetorical and device can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 493-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Synathroesmus, rhetorical and device.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Synathroesmus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Synathroesmus, rhetorical and device provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q140690652. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Synathroesmus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Synathroesmus primary sources, Synathroesmus archive and Synathroesmus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Synathroesmus”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Synathroesmus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.