Concordia (mythology)
goddess in ancient Roman religion
In ancient Roman religion, Concordia ("concord" or "harmony" in Latin) is the goddess who embodies agreement in marriage and society. Her Greek equivalent is usually regarded as Harmonia, with musical harmony a metaphor for an ideal of social concord or entente in the political discourse of the Republican era. She was thus often associated with Pax ("Peace") in representing a stable society. As such, she is more closely related to the Greek concept of homonoia (likemindedness), which was also represented by a goddess.
Concordia Augusta was cultivated as an aspect of Imperial cult. Dedicatory inscriptions to her, on behalf of emperors and members of the imperial family, were common.
In art and numismatics
In Roman art, Concordia was often depicted enthroned, wearing a long cloak and holding objects such as a patera (sacrificial bowl), cornucopia (symbol of prosperity), or a caduceus (symbol of peace). Standing, she was often shown between two other figures, either deities holding their own attributes or members of the imperial family shaking hands. She was placed frequently in a triad of goddesses, often with Pax, Salus or Securitas, or Fortuna. She was also paired with Hercules and Mercury, representing "Security and Luck" respectively.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Concordia (mythology)” as goddess in ancient Roman religion. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as goddess in ancient Roman religion. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q746321. VIAF identifies the subject as 8229331. The Library of Congress control number is no2019090590. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Concordia (mythology)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Concordia (mythology) primary sources, Concordia (mythology) archive and Concordia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Concordia (mythology)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Concordia (mythology)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.