Concord New Energy
Global renewable energy company
Concord New Energy Group Limited is a Singapore-headquartered renewable energy company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (0182.HK) and the Singapore Exchange (SEG.SG). The company is primarily engaged in the development, ownership, and operation of wind power, solar energy, and energy storage projects across the Asia-Pacific and North American regions.
History
Trade business
The company was named Nan Pei Hong International Holdings Limited in 1997, and was renamed NPH International Holdings Limited between 1997 and 2000. From 2000 to 2007, it was known as Hong Kong Pharmaceutical Industry Limited (also referred to as Hong Kong Pharmaceuticals or Hong Kong Medicine Industry).
Nam Pei Hong International Holdings was a Bermuda-incorporated offshore company. Nam Pak Hong (Chinese: 南北行) was a kind of trading company that import and export goods from China. Bonham Strand was also nicknamed "Nam Pak Hong street" in Chinese language. However, the listed company did not headquartered in Bonham Strand, also did not own any properties on that street. However, the listed company was the parent company of Nam Pei Hong Sum Yung Drugs Company Limited (南北行參茸葯材有限公司), a trading company in Chinese medicine such as dried abalone, birds' nests, dried scallops, ginseng, etc.
Before 1997, the business was incorporated and listed in Hong Kong as Nam Pei Hong (Holding) Limited (Chinese: 南北行（集團）有限公司).
“Concord New Energy” enters the record as global renewable energy company. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Concord, Energy and Global can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Concord New Energy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Concord, Energy and Global provides the most credible route into that argument.
The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10874830. None of the 4 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1997, 2000 and 2007.
Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Concord New Energy”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Concord New Energy primary sources, Concord New Energy archive and Concord research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Concord New Energy”?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Concord New Energy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.