Concerned Christians
inactive apocalyptic Christian movement in Colorado, United States
The Concerned Christians are a New Religious Movement founded in the mid 1980s by Monte Kim Miller. Miller initially formed the group as an anti-cult organization aimed at combatting New Age religious movements and anti-Christian sentiment. In the mid 1990's, Miller claimed he was receiving direct revelations from God, and the group's focus shifted towards extreme, apocalyptic messaging. The group has been described as both a terrorist group and a cult.
Foundation, Beliefs, and Values
The Concerned Christians were founded by Monte Kim Miller in the 1980s as a way to combat anti-Christian sentiment and New Age religiosity. Miller had previously worked as a marketing executive at Proctor and Gamble, and he also produced a radio program that broadcast the group's ideas. Miller claimed to have converted to Christianity in 1983. In 1996, Miller began to claim that God was speaking "through his mouth" in an interview with a local TV news station. In 2001, Miller opened a website for the group, which remains online as of September 2026. In 2002, Miller would claim that the end of the world had begun once more, and a holocaust would begin in the United States.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Concerned Christians” as inactive apocalyptic Christian movement in Colorado, United States. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as inactive apocalyptic Christian movement in Colorado, United States. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5158458. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1990, 1983, 1996 and 2001.
Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Concerned Christians”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Concerned Christians primary sources, Concerned Christians archive and Concerned research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Concerned Christians”?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Concerned Christians” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.