CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pro Cycling Team Fanini

cycling team

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ28652712 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pro Cycling Team Fanini was a cycling team founded in 2017, that was based in Albania and registered as a UCI Women's Team.

Team roster

As of 8 July 2019.

Major results

2018

Stage 1 (ITT) Giro della Campania in Rosa, Elena Franchi

Young rider classification Giro Toscana Int.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Pro Cycling Team Fanini” as cycling team. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cycling, Team and Fanini.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017, 2019, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2017. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cycling, Team and Fanini providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pro Cycling Team Fanini”, the useful work is to connect “cycling team” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28652712. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2017, 2019 and 2018.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pro Cycling Team Fanini”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pro Cycling Team Fanini primary sources, Pro Cycling Team Fanini archive and Cycling research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pro Cycling Team Fanini”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pro Cycling Team Fanini” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.