CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences

scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ2667573 ↗
Source-derived summary

Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences (French pronunciation: [kɔ̃t ʁɑ̃dy də lakademi de sjɑ̃s], Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences), or simply Comptes rendus, is a French scientific journal published since 1835. It is the proceedings of the French Academy of Sciences. It is currently split into seven sections, published on behalf of the Academy until 2020 by Elsevier: Mathématique, Mécanique, Physique, Géoscience, Palévol, Chimie, and Biologies. As of 2020, the Comptes Rendus journals are published by the Academy with a diamond open access model.

Naming history

The journal has had several name changes and splits over the years.

1835–1965

Comptes rendus was initially established in 1835 as Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences. It began as an alternative publication pathway for more prompt publication than the Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences, which had been published since 1666. The Mémoires, which continued to be published alongside the Comptes rendus throughout the nineteenth century, had a publication cycle which resulted in memoirs being published years after they had been presented to the Academy. Some academicians continued to publish in the Mémoires because of the strict page limits in the Comptes rendus.

1966–1980

After 1965 this title was split into five sections:

Série A (Sciences mathématiques) – mathematics

Série B (Sciences physiques) – physics and geosciences

Série C (Sciences chimiques) – chemistry

Série D (Sciences naturelles) – life sciences

Vie académique – academy notices and miscellanea (between 1968 and 1970, and again between 1979 and 1983)

Series A and B were published together in one volume except in 1974.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences” as scientific journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Comptes, rendus and l'Académie.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1835, 2020, 1965, 1666—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1835, 1836, 1837—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Comptes, rendus and l'Académie providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences”, the useful work is to connect “scientific journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2667573. VIAF identifies the subject as 2119145856968122920639. 7 of 8 selected statements include explicit references; 4 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1835, 2020, 1965 and 1666.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences primary sources, Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences archive and Comptes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.