Type (model theory)
term in model theory and related areas of mathematics

In model theory and related areas of mathematics, a type is an object that describes how a (real or possible) element or finite collection of elements in a mathematical structure might behave. More precisely, it is a set of first-order formulas in a language L with free variables x1, x2,..., xn that are true of a set of n-tuples of an L-structure
M
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}
. Depending on the context, types can be complete or partial and they may use a fixed set of constants, A, from the structure
M
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}
. The question of which types represent actual (tuples of) elements of
M
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}
leads to the ideas of saturated models and omitting types.
Definitions
Consider a structure
M
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}
for a language L. Let M be the universe of the structure. For every A ⊆ M, let L(A) be the language obtained from L by adding a constant ca for every a ∈ A. In other words,
L
(
A
)
=
L
∪
{
c
a
:
a
∈
A
}
.
{\displaystyle L(A)=L\cup \{c_{a}:a\in A\}.}
A 1-type (of
M
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}
) over A is a set p(x) of formulas in L(A) with at most one free variable x, such that for every finite subset p0(x) ⊆ p(x) there is some b ∈ M, depending on p0(x), with
M
⊨
p
0
(
b
)
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}\models p_{0}(b)}
. In other words,
M
⊨
∃
x
(
⋀
p
0
(
x
)
)
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}\models \exists x\left(\bigwedge p_{0}(x)\right)}
More generally, an n-type (of
M
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}
) over A is defined to be a set p(x1,...,xn) = p(x) of formulas in L(A), each having its free variables occurring only among the given n free variables x1,...,xn, such that for every finite subset p0(x) ⊆ p(x) there are some elements b1,...,bn ∈ M with
M
⊨
p
0
(
b
1
,
…
,
b
n
)
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}\models p_{0}(b_{1},\ldots ,b_{n})}
.
A complete type of
M
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}
over A is one that is maximal with respect to inclusion. Equivalently, for every
ϕ
(
x
)
∈
L
(
A
,
x
)
{\displaystyle \phi ({\boldsymbol {x}})\in L(A,{\boldsymbol {x}})}
either
ϕ
(
x
)
∈
p
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \phi ({\boldsymbol {x}})\in p({\boldsymbol {x}})}
or
¬
ϕ
(
x
)
∈
p
(
x
)
{\displaystyle \lnot \phi ({\boldsymbol {x}})\in p({\boldsymbol {x}})}
.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Type (model theory)” as term in model theory and related areas of mathematics. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as term in model theory and related areas of mathematics. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q834884. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Type (model theory)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Type (model theory) primary sources, Type (model theory) archive and Type research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Type (model theory)”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Type (model theory)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.