CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Comparative Education

academic journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ60785052
Source-derived summary

Comparative Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to comparative education. It was established in 1964 by Wilfred Douglas Halls (University of Oxford) and Edmund James King (King's College London). It is published by Taylor & Francis (formerly Carfax) and the editor-in-chief is David Phillips (University of Oxford). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2017 impact factor of 1.579, ranking it 95th out of 238 journals in the category "Education & Educational Research".

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Comparative Education” as academic journal. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1964, 2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Comparative, Education and academic can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as academic journal. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60785052. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1964 and 2017.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Comparative Education”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Comparative Education primary sources, Comparative Education archive and Comparative research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Comparative Education”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Comparative Education” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.