CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Commons Act 1285

United Kingdom legislation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ5153659
Source-derived summary

The Commons Act 1285 (13 Edw. 1. c. 46) was an act of the Parliament of England. It was chapter 46 of the Statute of Westminster the Second.

Subsequent developments

The act was extended to Ireland by Poynings' Law 1495 (10 Hen. 7. c. 22 (I)).

So much of this statute as ordained that the towns near adjoining were to be distrained to levy, at their own cost, a hedge or dyke overthrown, and to yield damages, was repealed, as to England and Wales, by the Criminal Statutes Repeal Act 1826 (7 & 8 Geo.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Commons Act 1285” is united Kingdom legislation. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Commons, United and Kingdom, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1285, 1495, 1826—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1285-01-01. For this dossier, Commons, United and Kingdom is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “united Kingdom legislation” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5153659. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1285, 1495 and 1826.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Commons Act 1285”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Commons Act 1285 primary sources, Commons Act 1285 archive and Commons research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Commons Act 1285”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Commons Act 1285” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.