Commissum divinitus
encyclical
Commissum divinitus was an encyclical letter issued by Pope Gregory XVI on 14 May 1835, addressed to the Swiss clergy.
Purpose
Gregory issued the encyclical in response to the Articles of Baden of 1834, calling them "false, rash, erroneous, prejudicial to the Holy See, destructive to the government of the Church and its divine constitution, and subjecting ecclesiastical ministry [of the] Church to secular domination". In particular, the encyclical criticizes the Swiss government for legalizing marriage between Catholics and non-Catholics, rejecting the suggestion that the secular government held the authority to regulate marriage.
Gregory refers to two historical texts in the letter where distinctions between ecclesiastical and civic authority had been maintained and the primacy of the former enforced:
Bishop Ossius of Cordoba's letter to Emperor Constantius II regarding imperial interference in church matters (353)
Pope Gelasius I's letter to Emperor Anastasius, Famuli vestrae pietatis, on the allocation of power within the spiritual and temporal realms (494).
The encyclical maintained Gregory's opposition to political liberalism. Gregory rejects the authority of secular governments to regulate the Catholic church, and opposes the idea of national churches. This position, as laid out in Commissum divinitus, led seven Catholic cantons of Switzerland to form the Sonderbund.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Commissum divinitus” is encyclical. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Commissum, divinitus and encyclical, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “encyclical” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1115647. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1835 and 1834.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Commissum divinitus”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Commissum divinitus primary sources, Commissum divinitus archive and Commissum research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Commissum divinitus”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Commissum divinitus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.