Colossally abundant number
concept in mathematics

In number theory, a colossally abundant number (sometimes abbreviated as CA) is a natural number that, in a particular, rigorous sense, has many divisors. Particularly, it is defined by a ratio between the sum of an integer's divisors and that integer raised to a power higher than one. For any such exponent, whichever integer has the highest ratio is a colossally abundant number. It is a stronger restriction than that of a superabundant number, but not strictly stronger than that of an abundant number.
Formally, a number n is said to be colossally abundant if there is an ε > 0 such that for all k > 1,
σ
(
n
)
n
1
+
ε
≥
σ
(
k
)
k
1
+
ε
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sigma (n)}{n^{1+\varepsilon }}}\geq {\frac {\sigma (k)}{k^{1+\varepsilon }}}}
where σ denotes the sum-of-divisors function. That is,
n
{\displaystyle n}
attains the maximum value of
σ
(
k
)
k
1
+
ε
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sigma (k)}{k^{1+\varepsilon }}}}
.
The first 15 colossally abundant numbers, 2, 6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520, 5040, 55440, 720720, 1441440, 4324320, 21621600, 367567200, 6983776800 (sequence A004490 in the OEIS) are also the first 15 superior highly composite numbers, but neither set is a subset of the other.
History
Colossally abundant numbers were first studied by Ramanujan and his findings were intended to be included in his 1915 paper on highly composite numbers. Unfortunately, the publisher of the journal to which Ramanujan submitted his work, the London Mathematical Society, was in financial difficulties at the time and Ramanujan agreed to remove aspects of the work to reduce the cost of printing. His findings were mostly conditional on the Riemann hypothesis and with this assumption he found upper and lower bounds for the size of colossally abundant numbers and proved that what would come to be known as Robin's inequality (see below) holds for all sufficiently large values of n.
“Colossally abundant number” enters the record as concept in mathematics. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Colossally, abundant and number can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Colossally abundant number” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Colossally, abundant and number provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3281381. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1915.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Colossally abundant number”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Colossally abundant number primary sources, Colossally abundant number archive and Colossally research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Colossally abundant number”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Colossally abundant number” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.