CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pseudotichia

genus of fungi

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ136798563 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pseudotichia is a fungal genus in the family Lichinaceae. It comprises the single species Pseudotichia vermiculata, a cyanolichen. Originally described in 1881 from material collected near Budapest, the species was later placed in Psorotichia before molecular studies demonstrated it represents a separate evolutionary line. It grows on calcareous rocks that are periodically wetted by seeping water, favouring exposed limestone surfaces. The lichen can be recognised by its dark, cracked crust with mostly embedded fruiting bodies and a distinctive cottony layer of fungal filaments anchoring it to the rock substrate.

Taxonomy

The genus Pseudotichia was introduced to hold a single species, Pseudotichia vermiculata, which had long been known under other names. The species was originally described in 1881 by William Nylander, who introduced it as Collemopsis vermiculata on the basis of material collected by Hugó Lojka from dolomitic rock near Budapest; he characterised it as a dark, sooty to brown-black, tile-cracked crustose lichen with immersed brown apothecia and simple ellipsoid spores, and noted its similarity to C. caesia. A few years later (1885), it was later transferred to Psorotichia as Psorotichia vermiculata. Molecular work has shown that it does not belong with Psorotichia in the strict sense but instead forms a separate lineage within Lichinaceae, warranting recognition of a new genus. The generic name refers to this history: Pseudotichia is named for its overall resemblance to Psorotichia, with the prefix "pseudo-" indicating that the similarity is superficial rather than reflecting a close relationship.

Editorial summary

“Pseudotichia” enters the record as genus of fungi. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pseudotichia, genus and fungi can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1881, 1885—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Pseudotichia, genus and fungi.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pseudotichia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pseudotichia, genus and fungi provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136798563. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1881 and 1885.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pseudotichia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pseudotichia primary sources, Pseudotichia archive and Pseudotichia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pseudotichia”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pseudotichia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.