CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

António de Faria

Portuguese navigator

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ2018390
Source-derived summary

António de Faria was a 16th-century Portuguese explorer and privateer. He was the first European to encounter the Mekong River of Southeast Asia in 1540. He anchored in Da Nang in 1535 and later tried to establish a major trading centre at the port village of Fai-Fo (current day Hội An, Vietnam).

Biography

Born in Campo de Coimbra, Alqueidão marshland, in Figueira da Foz, near Montemor-o-Velho.

Leaving for India, he went to seek his fortune in the Far East, exploring above all the coasts of China, more as a pirate than as an explorer, a privateer of the eastern seas, gaining a reputation as fearsome and terrible. He roamed Malacca as a ship's captain.

In 1535, Captain António de Faria was the first European (Portuguese) who, departing from Da Nang (later known as Tourane), where the Portuguese had landed in 1516, in what was then called Cochinchina (now Vietnam), established, or tried to establish, a trading post in the coastal city of Faifo, about 20 kilometers from present-day Da Nang. It was hoped that António de Faria would be able to create a permanent Portuguese enclave such as those at Macau and Goa; however, this attempt failed, as the trading post never flourished. He was also responsible for a misunderstanding of the name for Vietnam, calling the region "Cauchi", a name derived from the Chinese characters for Vietnam: Giao Chi. To avoid confusion with his colony of Cochin (Kochi), in India, he added 'China' to the region's name.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “António de Faria” as portuguese navigator. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around António, Faria and Portuguese.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1540, 1535, 1516—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with António, Faria and Portuguese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “António de Faria”, the useful work is to connect “portuguese navigator” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2018390. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1540, 1535 and 1516.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “António de Faria”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow António de Faria primary sources, António de Faria archive and António research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “António de Faria”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from António de Faria” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.