Pushout (category theory)
category-theoretic colimit of a diagram of the form 𝑋←𝑍→𝑌

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a pushout (also called a fibered coproduct or fibered sum or cocartesian square or amalgamated sum) is the colimit of a diagram consisting of two morphisms f : Z → X and g : Z → Y with a common domain. The pushout consists of an object P along with two morphisms X → P and Y → P that complete a commutative square with the two given morphisms f and g. In fact, the defining universal property of the pushout (given below) essentially says that the pushout is the "most general" way to complete this commutative square. Common notations for the pushout are
P
=
X
⊔
Z
Y
{\displaystyle P=X\sqcup _{Z}Y}
and
P
=
X
+
Z
Y
{\displaystyle P=X+_{Z}Y}
.
The pushout is the categorical dual of the pullback.
Universal property
Explicitly, the pushout of the morphisms f and g consists of an object P and two morphisms i1 : X → P and i2 : Y → P such that the diagram
commutes and such that (P, i1, i2) is universal with respect to this diagram. That is, for any other such triple (Q, j1, j2) for which the following diagram commutes, there must exist a unique u : P → Q also making the diagram commute:
As with all universal constructions, the pushout, if it exists, is unique up to a unique isomorphism.
Examples of pushouts
Here are some examples of pushouts in familiar categories. Note that in each case, we are only providing a construction of an object in the isomorphism class of pushouts; as mentioned above, though there may be other ways to construct it, they are all equivalent.
Suppose that X, Y, and Z as above are sets, and that f : Z → X and g : Z → Y are set functions.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Pushout (category theory)” is category-theoretic colimit of a diagram of the form 𝑋←𝑍→𝑌. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Pushout, category and theory, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “category-theoretic colimit of a diagram of the form 𝑋←𝑍→𝑌” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1633079. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pushout (category theory)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pushout (category theory) primary sources, Pushout (category theory) archive and Pushout research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pushout (category theory)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pushout (category theory)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.