CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Coefficient of relationship

measure of the degree of consanguinity (or biological relationship) between two individuals

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ2520805 ↗
Source-derived summary

The coefficient of relationship is a measure of the degree of consanguinity (or biological relationship) between two individuals. The term coefficient of relationship was defined by Sewall Wright in 1922, and was derived from his definition of the coefficient of inbreeding of 1921. The measure is most commonly used in genetics and genealogy. A coefficient of inbreeding can be calculated for an individual, and is typically one-half the coefficient of relationship between the parents.

In general, the higher the level of inbreeding the closer the coefficient of relationship between the parents approaches a value of 1, expressed as a percentage, and approaches a value of 0 for individuals with arbitrarily remote common ancestors.

Coefficient of relationship

The coefficient of relationship

r

{\textstyle r}

between two people B and C is obtained by a summation of coefficients calculated for every line by which they are connected to their common ancestors. Each such line connects the two people via a common ancestor, passing through no person who is not a common ancestor more than once. A path coefficient between an ancestor A and an offspring O separated by

n

{\displaystyle n}

generations is given as:

p

A

O

=

2

−

n

⋅

1

+

f

A

1

+

f

O

{\displaystyle p_{AO}=2^{-n}\cdot {\sqrt {\frac {1+f_{A}}{1+f_{O}}}}}

where

f

A

{\displaystyle f_{A}}

and

f

O

{\displaystyle f_{O}}

are the coefficients of inbreeding for A and O, respectively.

The coefficient of relationship

r

B

C

{\displaystyle r_{BC}}

is now obtained by summing over all path coefficients:

r

B

C

=

∑

p

A

B

⋅

p

A

C

{\displaystyle r_{BC}=\sum p_{AB}\cdot p_{AC}}

By assuming that the pedigree can be traced back to a sufficiently remote population of perfectly random-bred stock (fA = 0 for all A in the sum) the definition of r may be simplified to

r

B

C

=

∑

p

2

−

L

(

p

)

{\displaystyle r_{BC}=\sum _{p}2^{-L(p)}}

where p enumerates all paths connecting B and C with unique common ancestors (i.e. all paths terminate at a common ancestor and may not pass through a common ancestor to a common ancestor's ancestor), and L(p) is the length of the path p.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Coefficient of relationship” as measure of the degree of consanguinity (or biological relationship) between two individuals. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1922, 1921—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Coefficient, relationship and measure can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as measure of the degree of consanguinity (or biological relationship) between two individuals. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2520805. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1922 and 1921.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Coefficient of relationship”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Coefficient of relationship primary sources, Coefficient of relationship archive and Coefficient research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Coefficient of relationship”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Coefficient of relationship” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.