CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Different ideal

often referred to as "the different"

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 31, 2025
Entity authorityQ3027707
Source-derived summary

In algebraic number theory, the different ideal (sometimes simply the different) is defined to measure the (possible) lack of duality in the ring of integers of an algebraic number field K, with respect to the field trace. It then encodes the ramification data for prime ideals of the ring of integers. It was introduced by Richard Dedekind in 1882.

Definition

If OK is the ring of integers of K, and tr denotes the field trace from K to the rational number field Q, then

x

t

r

x

2

{\displaystyle x\mapsto \mathrm {tr} ~x^{2}}

is an integral quadratic form on OK. Its discriminant as quadratic form need not be +1 (in fact this happens only for the case K = Q). Define the inverse different or codifferent or Dedekind's complementary module as the set I of x ∈ K such that tr(xy) is an integer for all y in OK, then I is a fractional ideal of K containing OK. By definition, the different ideal δK is the inverse fractional ideal I−1: it is an ideal of OK.

The ideal norm of δK is equal to the ideal of Z generated by the field discriminant DK of K.

The different of an element α of K with minimal polynomial f is defined to be δ(α) = f′(α) if α generates the field K (and zero otherwise): we may write

δ

(

α

)

=

(

α

α

(

i

)

)

{\displaystyle \delta (\alpha )=\prod \left({\alpha -\alpha ^{(i)}}\right)\ }

where the α(i) run over all the roots of the characteristic polynomial of α other than α itself. The different ideal is generated by the differents of all integers α in OK. This is Dedekind's original definition.

The different is also defined for a finite degree extension of local fields. It plays a basic role in Pontryagin duality for p-adic fields.

Relative different

The relative different δL / K is defined in a similar manner for an extension of number fields L / K. The relative norm of the relative different is then equal to the relative discriminant ΔL / K. In a tower of fields L / K / F the relative differents are related by δL / F = δL / KδK / F.

The relative different equals the annihilator of the relative Kähler differential module

Ω

O

L

/

O

K

1

{\displaystyle \Omega _{O_{L}/O_{K}}^{1}}

:

δ

L

/

K

=

{

x

O

L

:

x

d

y

=

0

for all

y

O

L

}

.

{\displaystyle \delta _{L/K}=\{x\in O_{L}:x\mathrm {d} y=0{\text{ for all }}y\in O_{L}\}.}

The ideal class of the relative different δL / K is always a square in the class group of OL, the ring of integers of L. Since the relative discriminant is the norm of the relative different it is the square of a class in the class group of OK: indeed, it is the square of the Steinitz class for OL as a OK-module.

Editorial summary

“Different ideal” enters the record as often referred to as "the different". Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Different, ideal and often can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1882—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Different, ideal and often.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Different ideal” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Different, ideal and often provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 31, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3027707. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1882.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Different ideal”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Different ideal primary sources, Different ideal archive and Different research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Different ideal”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Different ideal” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.