Alliance for a Magnificent Albania
political party in Albania
Alliance for a Magnificent Albania (Albanian: Aleanca për Shqipërinë Madhështore, ASHM) is a predominantly centre-right Albanian political coalition in the 2025 parliamentary elections consisting of 24 conservative political parties in Albania. It is led by Democratic Party.
History
The Union for Victory Coalition (Albanian: Bashkimi për Fitoren) was a coalition of political parties in Albania. The spokesman was Gent Strazimiri. It received 37.1% of the vote and 46 members of parliament in the 2001 election.
Following the 1997 election and the Civil War. The Democratic party of Albania had lost its majority in parliament and as a result it had to continue to be in parliament as opposition. Sali Berisha had been blamed for the governments mishandling of the Pyramid Schemes. In 2001 Berisha and smaller Centrist and Right wing parties formed the "Union for Victory coalition" The Coalition itself was an attempt to change the bad image of 1997, Sali Berisha dressed his deputies in white shirts and formed the Coalition "Union for Victory". While the Coalition itself did make significant gains.
“Alliance for a Magnificent Albania” enters the record as political party in Albania. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Alliance, Magnificent and Albania can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Alliance for a Magnificent Albania” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Alliance, Magnificent and Albania provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q133578286. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2025, 2001 and 1997.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Alliance for a Magnificent Albania”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Alliance for a Magnificent Albania primary sources, Alliance for a Magnificent Albania archive and Alliance research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Alliance for a Magnificent Albania”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Alliance for a Magnificent Albania” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.