CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Cláudia da Silva

Brazilian volleyball player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ2980481 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cláudia Bueno da Silva (born 21 September 1987) is a Brazilian female volleyball player. She was part of the Brazil women's national volleyball team. On club level she played for Minas Tenis Clube in 2013.

Editorial summary

“Cláudia da Silva” enters the record as brazilian volleyball player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cláudia, Silva and Brazilian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1987, 2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1987-09-21. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cláudia, Silva and Brazilian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cláudia da Silva” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cláudia, Silva and Brazilian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2980481. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1987 and 2013.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cláudia da Silva”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cláudia da Silva primary sources, Cláudia da Silva archive and Cláudia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cláudia da Silva”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cláudia da Silva” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.