CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Clupeocharax

genus of fishes

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ19720767 ↗
Source-derived summary

Clupeocharax is a monospecific genus of freshwater ray-finned fish belonging to the family Alestidae, the African tetras. The only species in the genus is Clupeocharax schoutedeni a fish that is endemic to the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Taxonomy

Clupeocharax was first proposed as a genus in 1926 by the French ichthyologist Jacques Pellegrin when he described its only species, Clupeocharax schoutedeni. The type locality of C. schoutedeni was given as Tondu in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This taxon is classified within the African tetra family, Alestidae, in the order Characiformes.

Etymology

Clupeocharax combines Clupea, Latin for "herring", a reference to this peagic species herring-like body, with Charax, the type genus of the order Characiformes. Charax is derived from the Greek word chárax, which means a "pointed stake in a palisade", an allausion to these fishes having densely arranged sharp teeth and which forms the root of many genus names of characins. The specific name honours Henri Schouteden, a Belgian zoologist who collected specimens in the Belgian Congo, including the holotype of this taxon.

Description

Clupeocharax, as its name suggests, has a herring like body that grows to a maximum total length of 25 cm (9.8 in).

Distribution and habitat

Clupeocharax is endemic to the Democratic Republic of Congo where it occurs in Lake Tumba and Lake Yandja, near Yangambi in the Central Congo River basin.

Editorial summary

“Clupeocharax” enters the record as genus of fishes. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Clupeocharax, genus and fishes can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1926—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Clupeocharax, genus and fishes.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Clupeocharax” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Clupeocharax, genus and fishes provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q19720767. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1926.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Clupeocharax”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Clupeocharax primary sources, Clupeocharax archive and Clupeocharax research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Clupeocharax”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Clupeocharax” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.