CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cassiope lycopodioides

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ5756676 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cassiope lycopodioides is a plant species in the family Ericaceae, known by the common names clubmoss mountain-heather or Haida Gwaii mountain-heather. The species is native to northeast Asia and northwestern North America, where it grows on rocky slopes and crevices in arctic tundra and alpine tundra at elevations up to 2000 m.

Description

Cassiope lycopodioides is a perennial herb forming mats lying close to the ground. Leaves are narrow, up to 3 mm long, closely pressed against the stem. Curled hairs are present at the leaf tips, especially on younger leaves, and most populations (with the exception of those on Haida Gwaii) display hyaline or scarious leaf margins. Flowers are white, campanulate (bell-shaped), up to 20 mm across, and with a calyx of five fused sepals, often red or reddish green.

Distribution

The distribution of Cassiope lycopodioides spans an arc of the northern Pacific Rim, extending from northeast Asia over to northwestern North America. In Asia, the species ranges from high elevations on Honshu and Hokkaido in Japan, north through coastal mountain ranges and tundra of the Russian Far East.

In North America, the species is found across the Aleutian Islands into southern Alaska, coastal and interior British Columbia, and the U.S. State of Washington. Washington populations have been reported only from shaded alpine rock faces in King County and Snohomish County.

Editorial summary

“Cassiope lycopodioides” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cassiope, lycopodioides and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cassiope, lycopodioides and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cassiope lycopodioides” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cassiope, lycopodioides and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5756676. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cassiope lycopodioides”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cassiope lycopodioides primary sources, Cassiope lycopodioides archive and Cassiope research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cassiope lycopodioides”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cassiope lycopodioides” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.