CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Clostridium scatologenes

species of bacterium

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ3681146 ↗
Source-derived summary

Clostridium scatologenes (CLOSL) is an anaerobic, motile, gram-positive bacterium.

Originally, in 1925, Fellers and Clough named this species Clostridium scatol. In 1927, Weinberg and Ginsbourg's later reclassification was Bacillus scatologenes. The species has borne its present name since 1948.

References

"Clostridium scatologenes: (Weinberg and Ginsbourg 1927) Prevot 1948". National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).

UniProt. "Clostridium scatologenes". Retrieved 2012-03-02.

External links

"Clostridium scatologenes".

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Clostridium scatologenes” is species of bacterium. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Clostridium, scatologenes and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1925, 1927, 1948, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Clostridium, scatologenes and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of bacterium” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3681146. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1925, 1927, 1948 and 2012.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Clostridium scatologenes”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Clostridium scatologenes primary sources, Clostridium scatologenes archive and Clostridium research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Clostridium scatologenes”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Clostridium scatologenes” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.