CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Closed immersion

morphism of schemes f: X → Y such that the induced morphism from the structure sheaf of Y to its pullback onto Y is surjective; equivalently, one that can be defined by a quasicoherent sheaf of ideals

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ5135342
Source-derived summary

In algebraic geometry, a closed immersion of schemes is a morphism of schemes

f

:

Z

X

{\displaystyle f:Z\to X}

that identifies Z as a closed subset of X such that locally, regular functions on Z can be extended to X. The latter condition can be formalized by saying that

f

#

:

O

X

f

O

Z

{\displaystyle f^{\#}:{\mathcal {O}}_{X}\rightarrow f_{\ast }{\mathcal {O}}_{Z}}

is surjective.

An example is the inclusion map

Spec

(

R

/

I

)

Spec

(

R

)

{\displaystyle \operatorname {Spec} (R/I)\to \operatorname {Spec} (R)}

of affine schemes induced by the canonical ring map

R

R

/

I

{\displaystyle R\to R/I}

.

Other characterizations

The following are equivalent:

f

:

Z

X

{\displaystyle f:Z\to X}

is a closed immersion.

For every open affine

U

=

Spec

(

R

)

X

{\displaystyle U=\operatorname {Spec} (R)\subset X}

, there exists an ideal

I

R

{\displaystyle I\subset R}

such that

f

1

(

U

)

=

Spec

(

R

/

I

)

{\displaystyle f^{-1}(U)=\operatorname {Spec} (R/I)}

as schemes over U.

There exists an open affine covering

X

=

U

j

,

U

j

=

Spec

R

j

{\displaystyle X=\bigcup U_{j},U_{j}=\operatorname {Spec} R_{j}}

and for each j there exists an ideal

I

j

R

j

{\displaystyle I_{j}\subset R_{j}}

such that

f

1

(

U

j

)

=

Spec

(

R

j

/

I

j

)

{\displaystyle f^{-1}(U_{j})=\operatorname {Spec} (R_{j}/I_{j})}

as schemes over

U

j

{\displaystyle U_{j}}

.

There is a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals

I

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {I}}}

on X such that

f

O

Z

O

X

/

I

{\displaystyle f_{\ast }{\mathcal {O}}_{Z}\cong {\mathcal {O}}_{X}/{\mathcal {I}}}

and f is an isomorphism of Z onto the global Spec of

O

X

/

I

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}/{\mathcal {I}}}

over X.

Definition for locally ringed spaces

In the case of locally ringed spaces a morphism

i

:

Z

X

{\displaystyle i:Z\to X}

is a closed immersion if a similar list of criteria is satisfied:

The map

i

{\displaystyle i}

is a homeomorphism of

Z

{\displaystyle Z}

onto its image

The associated sheaf map

O

X

i

O

Z

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}\to i_{*}{\mathcal {O}}_{Z}}

is surjective with kernel

I

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {I}}}

The kernel

I

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {I}}}

is locally generated by sections as an

O

X

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{X}}

-module.

The only varying condition is the third. It is instructive to look at a counter-example to get a feel for what the third condition yields by looking at a map which is not a closed immersion,

i

:

G

m

A

1

{\displaystyle i:\mathbb {G} _{m}\hookrightarrow \mathbb {A} ^{1}}

where

G

m

=

Spec

(

Z

[

x

,

x

1

]

)

{\displaystyle \mathbb {G} _{m}={\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {Z} [x,x^{-1}])}

If we look at the stalk of

i

O

G

m

|

0

{\displaystyle i_{*}{\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {G} _{m}}|_{0}}

at

0

A

1

{\displaystyle 0\in \mathbb {A} ^{1}}

then there are no sections. This implies for any open subscheme

U

A

1

{\displaystyle U\subset \mathbb {A} ^{1}}

containing

0

{\displaystyle 0}

the sheaf has no sections. This violates the third condition since at least one open subscheme

U

{\displaystyle U}

covering

A

1

{\displaystyle \mathbb {A} ^{1}}

contains

0

{\displaystyle 0}

.

Properties

A closed immersion is finite and radicial (universally injective).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Closed immersion” as morphism of schemes f: X → Y such that the induced morphism from the structure sheaf of Y to its pullback onto Y is surjective; equivalently, one that can be defined by a quasicoherent sheaf of ideals. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 565-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Closed, immersion and morphism can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as morphism of schemes f: X → Y such that the induced morphism from the structure sheaf of Y to its pullback onto Y is surjective; equivalently, one that can be defined by a quasicoherent sheaf of ideals. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5135342. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Closed immersion”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Closed immersion primary sources, Closed immersion archive and Closed research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Closed immersion”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Closed immersion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.