CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Classification of Fatou components

components of the Fatou set

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ4223035
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, Fatou components are components of the Fatou set. They were named after Pierre Fatou.

Rational case

If f is a rational function

f

=

P

(

z

)

Q

(

z

)

{\displaystyle f={\frac {P(z)}{Q(z)}}}

defined in the extended complex plane, and if it is a nonlinear function (degree > 1)

d

(

f

)

=

max

(

deg

(

P

)

,

deg

(

Q

)

)

2

,

{\displaystyle d(f)=\max(\deg(P),\,\deg(Q))\geq 2,}

then for a periodic component

U

{\displaystyle U}

of the Fatou set, exactly one of the following holds:

U

{\displaystyle U}

contains an attracting periodic point

U

{\displaystyle U}

is parabolic

U

{\displaystyle U}

is a Siegel disc: a simply connected Fatou component on which f(z) is analytically conjugate to a Euclidean rotation of the unit disc onto itself by an irrational rotation angle.

U

{\displaystyle U}

is a Herman ring: a double connected Fatou component (an annulus) on which f(z) is analytically conjugate to a Euclidean rotation of a round annulus, again by an irrational rotation angle.

Attracting periodic point

The components of the map

f

(

z

)

=

z

(

z

3

1

)

/

3

z

2

{\displaystyle f(z)=z-(z^{3}-1)/3z^{2}}

contain the attracting points that are the solutions to

z

3

=

1

{\displaystyle z^{3}=1}

. This is because the map is the one to use for finding solutions to the equation

z

3

=

1

{\displaystyle z^{3}=1}

by Newton–Raphson formula. The solutions must naturally be attracting fixed points.

Herman ring

The map

f

(

z

)

=

e

2

π

i

t

z

2

(

z

4

)

/

(

1

4

z

)

{\displaystyle f(z)=e^{2\pi it}z^{2}(z-4)/(1-4z)}

and t = 0.6151732... will produce a Herman ring. It is shown by Shishikura that the degree of such map must be at least 3, as in this example.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Classification of Fatou components” as components of the Fatou set. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 312-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Classification, Fatou and components can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as components of the Fatou set. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4223035. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Classification of Fatou components”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Classification of Fatou components primary sources, Classification of Fatou components archive and Classification research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Classification of Fatou components”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Classification of Fatou components” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.