CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

Public General Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ22906397
Source-derived summary

The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (c. 12) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which consolidated and expanded law enforcement powers in addressing anti-social behaviour. One significant aspect of the act is that it replaced anti-social behaviour orders, the primary civil order in the United Kingdom since 1998, with criminal behaviour orders.

Background

The 2010 coalition government expressed its intention to replace ASBOs, citing the reasons that "breach rates are high, and the number issued has been steadily declining since 2005." In July 2010, Home Secretary Theresa May announced her intention to reform anti-social behaviour measures for England and Wales, with the abolition of ASBOs in due course in favour of alternative "community-based" social control policies.

In 2012, the government produced a white paper titled Putting victims first: more effective responses to anti-social behaviour, that outlined its intentions about reforming anti-social behaviour legislation. The white paper stated that it wanted to challenge "dangerous and yobbish behaviour of those who make victims' lives a misery". Liberal Democrat objections prevented the implementation of the paper's proposals. The 2013 government paper, Reform of Anti-Social Behaviour Powers: Groups 'Hanging Around' mentioned specifically targeting certain types of youths behaviour. It mentioned that the government acknowledged that youths 'hanging about' might cause people to feel intimidated and fear for their safety regardless if their behaviour was anti-social. Government publications also revealed it was eager to deal with concerns about the perceived anti-social behaviour of people who are drunks, beggars, and irresponsible dog owners.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014” as public General Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Anti-social, Behaviour and Crime.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014, 1998, 2010, 2005—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2014. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Anti-social, Behaviour and Crime providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014”, the useful work is to connect “public General Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q22906397. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2014, 1998, 2010 and 2005.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 primary sources, Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 archive and Anti-social research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.