CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Citizen Initiative for Development

political party in Morocco

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ3151118
Source-derived summary

The Citizen Initiative for Development (French: Initiative citoyenne pour le développement) was a political party in Morocco.

History and profile

The party was founded in 2002.

In the parliamentary election, held on 7 September 2007, the party did win 1 out of 325 seats. It was dissolved and merged into the Authenticity and Modernity Party in 2008.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Citizen Initiative for Development” as political party in Morocco. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Citizen, Initiative and Development.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2002, 2007, 2008—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2002. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Citizen, Initiative and Development providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Citizen Initiative for Development”, the useful work is to connect “political party in Morocco” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3151118. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2002, 2007 and 2008.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Citizen Initiative for Development”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Citizen Initiative for Development primary sources, Citizen Initiative for Development archive and Citizen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Citizen Initiative for Development”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Citizen Initiative for Development” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.