CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cinnabaria

genus of fungi

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ105960594
Source-derived summary

Cinnabaria is a monospecific fungal genus in the family Teloschistaceae, represented by its sole species, Cinnabaria boliviana. This lichen, found only in Bolivia, is distinguished by its unique genetic signature, as well as morphological characteristics like ascospore size and other traits. Despite its resemblance to certain species from the Caloplaca cinnabarina species complex, Cinnabaria boliviana belongs to a distinct genetic lineage.

Taxonomy

The genus Cinnabaria was circumscribed by Karina Wilk, Maciej Pabijan, and Robert Lücking, who also identified and formally described its sole species, Cinnabaria boliviana. The genus name Cinnabaria alludes to its similarity to members of the Caloplaca cinnabarina species group, as defined by Clifford Wetmore and Ingvar Kärnefelt in 1999. Despite these similarities, Cinnabaria boliviana shows a closer affinity to Group II in the phylogenetic tree, while the Caloplaca cinnabarina group aligns more with Group III. The type specimen was collected from the region of Inkarraya-Sipesipe in Quillacollo Province (Cochabamba Department, Bolivia).

Description

Cinnabaria boliviana is characterised by a pale yellow-orange thallus, which is areolate and somewhat lobate at the margin. The red apothecia, contrasting sharply with the thallus, are immersed and have polarilocular ascospores of medium size and thin septa, measuring between 2.0 and 3.5 μm in thickness. This lichen exhibits notable differences from the Caloplaca cinnabarina group in the size of its thallus, apothecia, and ascospores.

Habitat and distribution

Cinnabaria boliviana is currently known only from Bolivia, where it thrives in the dry Interandean Valles.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Cinnabaria” as genus of fungi. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cinnabaria, genus and fungi.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cinnabaria, genus and fungi providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Cinnabaria”, the useful work is to connect “genus of fungi” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q105960594. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cinnabaria”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cinnabaria primary sources, Cinnabaria archive and Cinnabaria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cinnabaria”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cinnabaria” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.