CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Chun Yuan Steel

STEEL PRODUCING COMPANY SITUATED IN TAIWAN

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ5116211 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chun Yuan Steel Industry (Chinese: 春源鋼鐵工業; pinyin: Chūn Yuán Gāngtiě Gōngyè; TWSE: 2010) is a steel producer in Taiwan. It is the largest steel company in northern Taiwan. Its factories are located in New Taipei, Taichung and Kaohsiung. Chun Yuan also invests for founding steel mills in Mainland China.

History

The company was established on 7 January 1966.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Chun Yuan Steel” as sTEEL PRODUCING COMPANY SITUATED IN TAIWAN. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chun, Yuan and Steel.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 1966—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1965-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chun, Yuan and Steel providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chun Yuan Steel”, the useful work is to connect “sTEEL PRODUCING COMPANY SITUATED IN TAIWAN” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5116211. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 1966.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chun Yuan Steel”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chun Yuan Steel primary sources, Chun Yuan Steel archive and Chun research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chun Yuan Steel”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chun Yuan Steel” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.