CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Chrysosporium

genus of fungi

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ5114948
Source-derived summary

Chrysosporium is a genus of hyaline hyphomycetes fungi in the family Onygenaceae.

Chrysosporium colonies are moderately fast-growing, flat, white to tan to beige in color; they often have a powdery or granular surface texture. Hyaline, one-celled (ameroconidia) are produced directly on vegetative hyphae by non-specialized conidiogenous cells. Conidia are typically pyriform to clavate with truncate bases (6 to 7 by 3.5 to 4 um) and are formed either intercalary (arthroconidia), laterally (often on pedicels), or terminally.

Clinical significance

Species of Chrysosporium are occasionally isolated from skin and nail scrapings, especially from feet, but, because they are common soil saprotrophs, they are usually considered as contaminants. There are about 22 species of Chrysosporium, several are keratinophilic with some also being thermotolerant, and cultures may closely resemble some dermatophytes, especially Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and some strains may also resemble cultures of Histoplasma and Blastomyces

Chrysosporium has been identified as an emerging infectious disease, first in Canada affecting reptiles at around 1995. It infected eastern massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus catenatus catenatus). By 2011, it had affected northern copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix mokasen), timber rattlesnakes, black rat snakes, black racer snakes and eastern garter snakes in New Jersey.

Species

Chrysosporium alboluteolum (Sacc. & Marchal) Dominik (1968)

Chrysosporium alvearium F.Liu & L.Cai (2018)

Chrysosporium articulatum Scharapov (1978)

Chrysosporium barabicum Scharapov (1974)

Chrysosporium botryoides Skou (1992)

Chrysosporium carmichaelii Oorschot (1980)

Chrysosporium chiropterorum Beguin & Larcher (2005)

Chrysosporium christchurchicum Tripathi & Kushwaha (2005)

Chrysosporium clavisporum Y.W.Zhang, Y.F.Han & Z.Q.Liang (2017)

Chrysosporium crassitunicatum Kushwaha & S.C.Agarwal (1977)

Chrysosporium echinulatum Hubka, Mallátová, Čmoková & M.Kolařík (2016)

Chrysosporium europae Sigler, Guarro & Punsola (1986)

Chrysosporium fermentatitritici K.Matsush.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Chrysosporium” as genus of fungi. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995, 2011, 1968, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Chrysosporium, genus and fungi can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of fungi. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5114948. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1995, 2011, 1968 and 2018.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chrysosporium”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chrysosporium primary sources, Chrysosporium archive and Chrysosporium research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chrysosporium”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Chrysosporium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.