CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Christine Thomson

emeritus professor of human nutrition at University of Otago in New Zealand

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 18, 2025
Entity authorityQ117579960
Source-derived summary

Christine Dumont Thomson is a New Zealand nutritionist and academic, and is professor emerita at the University of Otago. Before her retirement in 2010 she researched iodine and selenium dietary deficiencies.

Academic career

Thomson completed a Bachelor and Master of Health Science and a PhD at the University of Otago. Her doctoral dissertation was on the importance of selenium in the diet. Thomson joined the faculty of the university in 1976, rising to full professor in 2006.

Thomson's research focused on iodine and selenium in the diet, but she also had an interest in sports nutrition. Her interest in iodine continued a tradition of research into nutritional deficiencies at Otago, started by Charles Hercus, Noel Benson, Charles L. Carter and Muriel Bell, who showed in the 1920s that iodine deficiency in New Zealand soils was causing goitre. Iodised salt became available in New Zealand in 1939, but Thomson's research in the 1990s showed that iodine deficiency was once again a problem in New Zealand. A 2002 survey of schoolchildren by colleague Sheila Skeaff showed mild iodine deficiency, and the 2008–2009 National Nutrition Survey found similar in adults. The food standards were then altered so that it became mandatory to use iodised salt in bread, and subsequent surveys have shown a decline in iodine deficiency.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Christine Thomson” as emeritus professor of human nutrition at University of Otago in New Zealand. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Christine, Thomson and emeritus.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 1976, 2006, 1939—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Christine, Thomson and emeritus providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Christine Thomson”, the useful work is to connect “emeritus professor of human nutrition at University of Otago in New Zealand” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q117579960. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010, 1976, 2006 and 1939.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Christine Thomson”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Christine Thomson primary sources, Christine Thomson archive and Christine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Christine Thomson”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Christine Thomson” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.