CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Christina Scherling

Swedish speed skater

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ23020140
Source-derived summary

Sigrid Christina Lindblom-Scherling (28 June 1940 – 24 April 2026) was a Swedish speed skater. She competed in 500–3000 m events at the 1960, 1964 and 1968 Winter Olympics and finished in 5–15th place. Scherling died on 24 April 2026, at the age of 85.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Christina Scherling” as swedish speed skater. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Christina, Scherling and Swedish.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1940, 2026, 1960, 1964—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1940-06-28. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Christina, Scherling and Swedish providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Christina Scherling”, the useful work is to connect “swedish speed skater” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23020140. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1940, 2026, 1960 and 1964.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Christina Scherling”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Christina Scherling primary sources, Christina Scherling archive and Christina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Christina Scherling”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Christina Scherling” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.