CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Christian Thune Jacobsen

Danish male curler and coach

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 2, 2025
Entity authorityQ108170904 ↗
Source-derived summary

Christian Thune Jacobsen (also known as Christian Thune-Jacobsen, Christian Thune) is a Danish curler and curling coach.

At the national level he is a two-time Danish men's champion curler (1984, 1991) and a two-time Danish men's champion curler (1989, 1990).

Teams

Men's

Mixed

Record as a coach of national teams

References

External links

Christian Thune Jacobsen at World Curling

Derfor fejer man med kost i curling | Naturvidenskab | DR(in Danish) (look at: "...

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Christian Thune Jacobsen” as danish male curler and coach. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Christian, Thune and Jacobsen.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984, 1991, 1989, 1990—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Christian, Thune and Jacobsen providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Christian Thune Jacobsen”, the useful work is to connect “danish male curler and coach” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 2, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q108170904. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1984, 1991, 1989 and 1990.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Christian Thune Jacobsen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Christian Thune Jacobsen primary sources, Christian Thune Jacobsen archive and Christian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Christian Thune Jacobsen”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Christian Thune Jacobsen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.