CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Robbins' problem

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ7341042 ↗
Source-derived summary

In probability theory, Robbins' problem of optimal stopping, named after Herbert Robbins, is sometimes referred to as the fourth secretary problem or the problem of minimizing the expected rank with full information. Let

X

1

,

⋯

,

X

n

{\displaystyle X_{1},\cdots ,X_{n}}

be independent, identically distributed random variables, uniform on

[

0

,

1

]

{\displaystyle [0,1]}

. We observe the

X

k

{\displaystyle X_{k}}

's sequentially and must stop on exactly one of them. No recall of preceding observations is permitted. What stopping rule minimizes the expected rank of the selected observation, and what is its corresponding value?The general solution to this full-information expected rank problem is unknown. The major difficulty is that the problem is fully history-dependent, that is, the optimal rule depends at every stage on all preceding values, and not only on simpler sufficient statistics of these. Only bounds are known for the limiting value v as n goes to infinity, namely

1.908

<

v

<

2.329

{\displaystyle 1.908<v<2.329}

. These bounds are obtained by studying so-called memoryless strategies, that is strategies in which the decision to stop on

X

k

{\displaystyle X_{k}}

depends only on the value of

X

k

{\displaystyle X_{k}}

and not on the history of observations

X

1

,

⋯

,

X

k

−

1

{\displaystyle X_{1},\cdots ,X_{k-1}}

. It is known that there is some room to improve the lower bound by further computations for a truncated version of the problem within the class of memoryless stategeies. It is still not known how to improve on the upper bound for the limiting value, and this for whatever strategy.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Robbins' problem” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 268-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Robbins', problem and Open-knowledge can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7341042. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Robbins' problem”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Robbins' problem primary sources, Robbins' problem archive and Robbins' research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Robbins' problem”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Robbins' problem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.