Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station
railway station in Kashima, Ibaraki prefecture, Japan

Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station (長者ヶ浜潮騒はまなす公園前駅, Chōjagahama Shiosai Hamanasu Kōenmae-eki; "in front of the park of sea roar and rugosa roses by Chojagahama beach") is a passenger railway station in the town of Kashima, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan operated by the third sector Kashima Rinkai Railway.
The station was originally tied with Minamiaso Mizu-no-Umareru-Sato Hakusui-Kōgen Station in Kumamoto Prefecture for the longest train station name in Japan, with 22 hiragana characters each, until both were surpassed by Tōjiin Ritsumeikan University Station in Kyoto in 2020.
Lines
Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station is served by the Ōarai Kashima Line, and is located 48.4 km from the official starting point of the line at Mito Station.
Station layout
The station consists of one elevated side platform, serving traffic in both directions. There is no station building and the station is unattended.
History
Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station was opened on 11 November 1990.
Passenger statistics
In fiscal 2015, the station was used by an average of 63 passengers daily.
“Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station” enters the record as railway station in Kashima, Ibaraki prefecture, Japan. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae, Station and railway can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae, Station and railway provides the most credible route into that argument.
The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5118991. Authority coordinates are 36.031, 140.619. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020, 1990 and 2015.
A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.
- Historic place names
- Jurisdictional context
- Routes into maps and plans
Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station primary sources, Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station archive and Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station”?
- Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
- What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Chōjagahamashiosaihamanasukōenmae Station” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.