CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chomchadila, California

human settlement in United States of America

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ5104423
Source-derived summary

Chomchadila (also written as Choam-cha-di-la-poma or Tcómtcadila) is a former Pomo settlement in Mendocino County, California, United States. While its precise location is unknown, it was said to be on a mesa south of Calpella, about two miles north of the confluence of the East Fork and Russian River. The namesake of the latter comes from Kalpela, a chief of the settlement.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Chomchadila, California” as human settlement in United States of America. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chomchadila, California and human.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 62-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chomchadila, California and human providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chomchadila, California”, the useful work is to connect “human settlement in United States of America” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5104423. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chomchadila, California”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chomchadila, California primary sources, Chomchadila, California archive and Chomchadila research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chomchadila, California”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Chomchadila, California” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.