Chlorissa
genus of insects

Chlorissa is a genus of moths in the family Geometridae erected by James Francis Stephens in 1831.
Species
Chlorissa albistrigulata Warren, 1897
Chlorissa amphitritaria (Oberthür, 1879)
Chlorissa anadema (Prout, 1930)
Chlorissa arkitensis Viidalepp, 1988
Chlorissa asphaleia Wiltshire, 1966
Chlorissa cloraria (Hübner, [1813])
Chlorissa discessa Walker, 1861
Chlorissa etruscaria (Zeller, 1849)
Chlorissa faustinata (Millière, 1868)
Chlorissa gelida (Butler, 1889)
Chlorissa gigantaria (Staudinger, 1892)
Chlorissa macrotyro Inoue, 1954
Chlorissa obliterata (Walker, 1863)
Chlorissa pretiosaria (Staudinger, 1877)
Chlorissa rubrifrons (Warren, 1894)
Chlorissa sachalinensis (Matsumura, 1925)
Chlorissa talvei Viidalepp, 1988
Chlorissa vermiculata Warren, 1897
Chlorissa viridata (Linnaeus, 1758) – small grass emerald
References
Savela, Markku. "Chlorissa Stephens, 1831". Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms. Retrieved April 13, 2019.
Pitkin, Brian & Jenkins, Paul. "Search results Family: Geometridae". Butterflies and Moths of the World. Natural History Museum, London.
The public source identifies “Chlorissa” as genus of insects. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chlorissa, genus and insects.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chlorissa”, the useful work is to connect “genus of insects” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4353049. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1831, 1897, 1879 and 1930.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Chlorissa”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Chlorissa primary sources, Chlorissa archive and Chlorissa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chlorissa”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Chlorissa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.