CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Tăuteu

commune in Bihor County, Romania

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ16425738
Source-derived summary

Tăuteu (also Tăuteni; Hungarian: Tóti) is a commune in Bihor County, Crișana, Romania with a population of 4,063 people. It is composed of five villages: Bogei (Bozsaly), Chiribiș (Bisztraterebes), Ciutelec (Cséhtelek), Poiana (Rétimalomtanya) and Tăuteu.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Tăuteu” as commune in Bihor County, Romania. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Tăuteu, commune and Bihor.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current 35-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Tăuteu, commune and Bihor providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Tăuteu”, the useful work is to connect “commune in Bihor County, Romania” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16425738. Authority coordinates are 47.261, 22.327. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tăuteu”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tăuteu primary sources, Tăuteu archive and Tăuteu research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tăuteu”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Tăuteu” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.