Fluctuating workweek overtime
Open-knowledge reference entry
Fluctuating workweek overtime, sometimes also called Chinese overtime, is the practice of calculating overtime wages based on a salaried employee's average hourly wage.
Overview
Using this system, employees are paid a weekly salary for a fixed number of hours, and any hours which exceed this are compensated for at a rate that is at least 50% of their average hourly earnings under salary. Under this method, the average hourly rate paid to employees decreases as the number of hours worked increases. Calculating wages based on this method often reduces administrative costs to the employer. It is primarily used by workplaces whose employees regularly work overtime, and where the number of hours worked varies greatly from week to week.
In the United States
In the United States, employees must be paid a fixed salary regardless of the weekly hours worked, in order for fluctuating week overtime to apply. The United States Department of Labor revised the Fair Labor Standards Act to give employers more flexibility in using the fluctuating workweek method for calculating overtime.
In 2014, employees of PepsiCo filed a lawsuit against the company alleging that the company had denied them proper compensation by calculating their pay incorrectly based on the fluctuating workweek. The suit sought $3 million in back wages.
“Fluctuating workweek overtime” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Fluctuating, workweek and overtime can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Fluctuating workweek overtime” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Fluctuating, workweek and overtime provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q109974917. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Fluctuating workweek overtime”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Fluctuating workweek overtime primary sources, Fluctuating workweek overtime archive and Fluctuating research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fluctuating workweek overtime”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Fluctuating workweek overtime” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.