CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Chinese Evangelisation Society

organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 19, 2018
Entity authorityQ5100447 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Chinese Evangelisation Society (Chinese 中國傳教會) was an early British Protestant Christian missionary society that was involved in sending workers to China during the late Qing Dynasty. It was founded by Prussian Lutheran clergyman Karl Gützlaff. Hudson Taylor was the first missionary to be sent overseas in 1853. The society disbanded in 1865.

See also

OMF International (formerly China Inland Mission and Overseas Missionary Fellowship)

Protestant missionary societies in China during the 19th Century

References

American Presbyterian Mission (1867). Memorials of Protestant Missionaries to the Chinese. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.

Editorial summary

“Chinese Evangelisation Society” enters the record as organization. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Chinese, Evangelisation and Society can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1853, 1865, 1867—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Chinese, Evangelisation and Society.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Chinese Evangelisation Society” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Chinese, Evangelisation and Society provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 19, 2018. The linked authority identifier is Q5100447. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1853, 1865 and 1867.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chinese Evangelisation Society”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chinese Evangelisation Society primary sources, Chinese Evangelisation Society archive and Chinese research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chinese Evangelisation Society”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chinese Evangelisation Society” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.