ASAT program of China
Chinese military initiative

China's anti-satellite (ASAT) program has been under development since 1964. The ASAT program has since been moved from Program 640 to Program 863, the General Armaments Department and the State Administration for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense (SASTIND, formerly known as Commission for Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense). Since its inception, the ASAT program has made progress on the development of three ASAT capable Systems: direct fire, directed-energy weapon, and microsatellites. Tests of these systems have either been directly acknowledged by the PRC, or reported on as ASAT capable. China is pursuing a broad and robust array of counterspace capabilities, which includes direct-ascent antisatellite missiles, co-orbital antisatellite systems, computer network operations, groundbased
satellite jammers, and directed energy weapons.
People's Liberation Army (PLA) has formed military units and begun initial operational training with counterspace capabilities that it has been developing, such as ground-launched ASAT missiles.
History
China has worked on technologies applicable to Anti-Satellite (ASAT) weaponry since 1964. According to Qian Xuesen, at a meeting in 1964, "suddenly Chairman Mao asked me if it was possible to shoot down a missile, I replied that it should be possible." In 1966, China formally began to develop a missile interceptor system, Program 640. This program was centered at a research base in Yunnan and the PLA Air Force oversaw it.
For much of the 1960s and 1970s the majority of funding and development of ASAT capabilities were run through Program 640.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “ASAT program of China” as chinese military initiative. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as chinese military initiative. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4654051. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1964 and 1966.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “ASAT program of China”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow ASAT program of China primary sources, ASAT program of China archive and ASAT research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ASAT program of China”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “ASAT program of China” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.