CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today

Scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ15755251 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today is a bimonthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Tekno Scienze Publisher, covering chemistry. It was established in 1983 and the editor-in-chief is Gayle De Maria.

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in Copyright Clearance Center, Chemical Abstracts, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Scopus. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2015 impact factor of 0.538.

Editorial summary

“Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today” enters the record as scientific journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Chimica, Oggi and Chemistry can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1983, 2015—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1983-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Chimica, Oggi and Chemistry.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Chimica, Oggi and Chemistry provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15755251. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1983 and 2015.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today primary sources, Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today archive and Chimica research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.