CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Chilbosan (North Chungcheong)

Mountain in Goesan, South Korea

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ5097626 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chilbosan (Korean: 칠보산) is a mountain in Goesan County, North Chungcheong Province in South Korea. It has an elevation of 778 m (2,552 ft).

See also

List of mountains in Korea

References

Sources

An, Gyeong-ho (2007). 한국 300 명산 [300 Korean Mountains] (in Korean). Seoul: 깊은솔 (Gipeunsol). ISBN 978-89-89917-21-2.

Yu, Jeong-yeol (2007). 한국의 산 여행 [Travel Guide to Korean Mountains] (in Korean). Seoul: 관동 상억연구회 (Kwandong). ISBN 978-89-958055-1-0.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Chilbosan (North Chungcheong)” as mountain in Goesan, South Korea. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chilbosan, North and Chungcheong.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Chilbosan, North and Chungcheong providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chilbosan (North Chungcheong)”, the useful work is to connect “mountain in Goesan, South Korea” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5097626. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chilbosan (North Chungcheong)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chilbosan (North Chungcheong) primary sources, Chilbosan (North Chungcheong) archive and Chilbosan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chilbosan (North Chungcheong)”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chilbosan (North Chungcheong)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.