CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Schikorr reaction

transformation of Fe(OH)2 into Fe3O4 with hydrogen release

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ3931191
Source-derived summary

The Schikorr reaction formally describes the conversion of the iron(II) hydroxide (Fe(OH)2) into iron(II,III) oxide (Fe3O4). This transformation reaction was first studied by Gerhard Schikorr. The global reaction follows:

3

Fe

(

OH

)

2

ferrous

hydroxide

Fe

3

O

4

magnetite

+

H

2

hydrogen

+

2

H

2

O

water

{\displaystyle {\ce {{\underset {ferrous\ hydroxide}{3Fe(OH)2}}->{\underset {magnetite}{Fe3O4}}+{\underset {hydrogen}{H2}}+{\underset {water}{2H2O}}}}}

It is of special interest in the context of the serpentinization, the formation of hydrogen by the action of water on a common mineral.

Reaction mechanism

The Schikorr reaction can be viewed as two distinct processes:

the anaerobic oxidation of two Fe(II) (Fe2+) into Fe(III) (Fe3+) by the protons of water. The reduction of two water protons is accompanied by the production of molecular hydrogen (H2), and;

the loss of two water molecules from the iron(II) and iron(III) hydroxides giving rise to its dehydration and to the formation of a thermodynamically more stable phase iron(II,III) oxide.

The global reaction can thus be decomposed in half redox reactions as follows:

2 (Fe2+ → Fe3+ + e−) (oxidation of 2 iron(II) ions)

2 (H2O + e− → ½ H2 + OH−) (reduction of 2 water protons)

to give:

2 Fe2+ + 2 H2O → 2 Fe3+ + H2 + 2 OH−

Adding to this reaction one intact iron(II) ion for each two oxidized iron(II) ions leads to:

3 Fe2+ + 2 H2O → Fe2+ + 2 Fe3+ + H2 + 2 OH−

Electroneutrality requires the iron cations on both sides of the equation to be counterbalanced by 6 hydroxyl anions (OH−):

3 Fe2+ + 6 OH− + 2 H2O → Fe2+ + 2 Fe3+ + H2 + 8 OH−

3 Fe(OH)2 + 2 H2O → Fe(OH)2 + 2 Fe(OH)3 + H2

For completing the main reaction, two companion reactions have still to be taken into account:

The autoprotolysis of the hydroxyl anions; a proton exchange between two OH−, like in a classical acid–base reaction:

OH− + OH− → O2− + H2O

acid 1 + base 2 → base 1 + acid 2, or also,

2 OH− → O2− + H2O

it is then possible to reorganize the global reaction as:

3 Fe(OH)2 + 2 H2O → (FeO + H2O) + (Fe2O3 + 3 H2O) + H2

3 Fe(OH)2 + 2 H2O → FeO + Fe2O3 + 4 H2O + H2

3 Fe(OH)2 → FeO + Fe2O3 + 2 H2O + H2

Considering then the formation reaction of iron(II,III) oxide:

Fe

II

O

+

Fe

2

III

O

3

Fe

3

O

4

{\displaystyle {\ce {Fe^{II}O + Fe^{III}2O3 -> Fe3O4}}}

it is possible to write the balanced global reaction:

3 Fe(OH)2 → (FeO·Fe2O3) + 2 H2O + H2

in its final form, known as the Schikorr reaction:

3 Fe(OH)2 → Fe3O4 + 2 H2O + H2

Occurrences

The Schikorr reaction can occur in the process of anaerobic corrosion of iron and carbon steel in various conditions.

Anaerobic corrosion of metallic iron to give iron(II) hydroxide and hydrogen:

3 (Fe + 2 H2O → Fe(OH)2 + H2)

followed by the Schikorr reaction:

3 Fe(OH)2 → Fe3O4 + 2 H2O + H2

give the following global reaction:

3 Fe + 6 H2O → Fe3O4 + 2 H2O + 4 H2

3 Fe + 4 H2O → Fe3O4 + 4 H2

At low temperature, the anaerobic corrosion of iron can give rise to the formation of "green rust" (fougerite) an unstable layered double hydroxide (LDH). In function of the geochemical conditions prevailing in the environment of the corroding steel, iron(II) hydroxide and green rust can progressively transform in iron(II,III) oxide, or if bicarbonate ions are present in solution, they can also evolve towards more stable carbonate phases such as iron carbonate (FeCO3), or iron(II) hydroxycarbonate (Fe2(OH)2(CO3), chukanovite) isomorphic to copper(II) hydroxycarbonate (Cu2(OH)2(CO3), malachite) in the copper system.

Application fields

Anaerobic oxidation of iron and steel commonly finds place in oxygen-depleted environments, such as in permanently water-saturated soils, peat bogs or wetlands in which archaeological iron artefacts are often found.

Anaerobic oxidation of carbon steel of canisters and overpacks is also expected to occur in deep geological formations in which high-level radioactive waste and spent fuels should be ultimately disposed.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Schikorr reaction” is transformation of Fe(OH)2 into Fe3O4 with hydrogen release. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Schikorr, reaction and transformation, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 695-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Schikorr, reaction and transformation is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “transformation of Fe(OH)2 into Fe3O4 with hydrogen release” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3931191. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Schikorr reaction”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Schikorr reaction primary sources, Schikorr reaction archive and Schikorr research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Schikorr reaction”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Schikorr reaction” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.