Chicago Daily Law Bulletin
newspaper published in Chicago

The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (CDLB) is a daily newspaper in Chicago, Illinois, that covers the region's local court systems and the legal community. Founded in 1854, it is the oldest daily court newspaper in the United States.
Content
Published every weekday afternoon aside from a few national holidays, CDLB features original reporting on legal decisions, verdicts and settlements from the Circuit Court of Cook County, the Illinois Appellate Court, the Supreme Court of Illinois, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Additionally, the paper covers Illinois-practicing attorneys, local law firms, Illinois' nine law schools and the Illinois General Assembly.
The newspaper places reporters full-time at the Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse and the Richard J. Daley Center in Chicago, and the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois.
Trial Notebook
Since 2002, the front page of every CDLB edition has included Chicago attorney Steven Garmisa's "Trial Notebook" column highlighting key legal points from recent state or federal appellate opinions. Garmisa is the fourth attorney to hold the daily columnist role. His predecessor, Theodore Postel, wrote his daily column for almost 30 years.
Lawyers' Forum
The Daily Law Bulletin does not have an editorial board and does not publish staff-written opinion pieces. The "Lawyers' Forum" space publishes pieces submitted by Illinois attorneys that offer "their expertise and insight," under the publication's submission guidelines.
The public source identifies “Chicago Daily Law Bulletin” as newspaper published in Chicago. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Chicago, Daily and Bulletin.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Chicago Daily Law Bulletin”, the useful work is to connect “newspaper published in Chicago” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 5, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q55666451. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1854 and 2002.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Chicago Daily Law Bulletin”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Chicago Daily Law Bulletin primary sources, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin archive and Chicago research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chicago Daily Law Bulletin”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Chicago Daily Law Bulletin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.