CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Martha Cheung

Chinese translator

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ20273477 ↗
Source-derived summary

Martha Pui Yiu Cheung (Chinese: 張佩瑤; 1953–2013) was a researcher and scholar in Translation Studies, Chair Professor in Translation and Director of the Centre for Translation at Hong Kong Baptist University. She was best known for the first volume of her Anthology on Chinese Discourse on Translation, published in 2006. She was working on the second volume of the anthology at the time of her death. Cheung was also noted for her works in translation theory, literary translation, and translation history.

Contributions

Professor Cheung was a leading scholar in the internationalisation of Translation Studies, drawing attention to the Eurocentric focus of the discipline and helping to raise the profile of Chinese translation theory. Her work on the special issue of The Translator helped provide non-European perspectives by focusing on Asian translation matters. She was interested in the role of comparative research in translation in her effort to describe Chinese translation concepts to non-Chinese readers. Cheung opted to explain foreign concepts in familiar terms in order to negate the differences between cultures and tradition.

The Hong Kong Academy of the Humanities awards the Martha Cheung Book Prize in Translation in her honour.

Scholarly works

(1997) 'Oxford Anthology of Contemporary Chinese Drama' Oxford: Oxford University Press

(2005) ‘To Translate’ Means ‘To Exchange’?

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Martha Cheung” as chinese translator. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Martha, Cheung and Chinese.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1953, 2013, 2006, 1997—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1953-07-17. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Martha, Cheung and Chinese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Martha Cheung”, the useful work is to connect “chinese translator” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q20273477. VIAF identifies the subject as 115910174. The Library of Congress control number is nr94032388. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1953, 2013, 2006 and 1997.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Martha Cheung”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Martha Cheung primary sources, Martha Cheung archive and Martha research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Martha Cheung”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Martha Cheung” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.