CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Chesham and Amersham

Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1974 onwards

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ1075935 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chesham and Amersham is a parliamentary constituency in Buckinghamshire, South East England, represented in the House of Commons by Sarah Green, a Liberal Democrat elected at a 2021 by-election.

Constituency profile

The Chesham and Amersham constituency is located in Buckinghamshire. It lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt, the protected rural area surrounding London, and also within the Chiltern Hills, a National Landscape. It is named after the neighbouring market towns of Chesham and Amersham, and also includes the smaller town of Gerrards Cross and the villages of Hazlemere, Little Chalfont, Chalfont St Giles and Chalfont St Peter. The constituency is highly affluent and most areas within it form part of the 10% least-deprived areas in England. The average house price is more than double the national average. Chesham and Amersham are connected to London by the Metropolitan line, making them some of the most distant locations from central London served by the London Underground.

Compared to national averages, residents of the constituency are older, well-educated, considerably wealthier and much more likely to work in professional occupations. White people make up 82% of the population with Asians, mostly Indians, forming the largest ethnic minority group at 12%. At the local county council, Chesham and Amersham are represented by Liberal Democrat councillors whilst the southern parts of the constituency around Gerrards Cross elected Conservatives.

Editorial summary

“Chesham and Amersham” enters the record as parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1974 onwards. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Chesham, Amersham and Parliamentary can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1974-02-28. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Chesham, Amersham and Parliamentary.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Chesham and Amersham” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Chesham, Amersham and Parliamentary provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1075935. Authority coordinates are 51.694, -0.610. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2021.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chesham and Amersham”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chesham and Amersham primary sources, Chesham and Amersham archive and Chesham research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chesham and Amersham”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chesham and Amersham” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.